(480) 630-0212
Se Habla Espanol
The way a fertility clinic should be.

ACFS Blog

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for breast cancer risk during IVF is feasible, study indicates

March 6th, 2013

It is now scientifically feasible to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) during IVF to screen embryos for genes associated with high breast cancer risks, scientists say.

European researchers presented the results of a major study- as yet the largest in this area of research, at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology’s annual meeting in Istanbul, Turkey. They conclude that the technique can be used reliably so that men and women who carry cancer-causing mutations in their BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes do not pass them on to their children. Female carriers of a mutation in either gene have a 60 to 80 percent chance of developing breast cancer over their lifetimes, and a risk of 30 to 60 percent (BRCA1) or five to 20 (BRCA2) for ovarian cancer.

The PGD procedure allows doctors to identify which embryos carry these genes, and therefore only implant ones that do not, thereby removing mutations from the family tree.

The study looked at 145 cycles of IVF in 70 couples where one partner carried one of the BRCA mutations. A total of 717 embryos were created for these couples and cultured in-vitro for three days- when they would have comprise eight cells- at which point one cell was extracted and tested for the presence of a BRCA mutation.

Overall, 43 percent of the embryos were affected, while 40 percent did not carry the mutations and were considered viable. Using the unaffected, the couples achieved a 41 percent pregnancy rate, or 42 pregnancies in 40 women in total.

“We now believe that this technique offers an established option for those couples seeking to avoid the risk of inherited BRCA in their children”, said professor William Verpoest, from the Vrije University in Brussels, who presented the study.

Speaking to the BBC, Mr. Stuart Lavery, director of IVF at Hammersmith Hospital in London said that the study, published months earlier in the journal Human Reproduction, was “quite an important paper”. He said that knowing that removing that removing “12.5 percent of the whole genetic mass of the embryo” for testing did not affect the embryo’s viability was “huge reassuring”.

In his presentation, Professor Verpoest recognized the debates on the ethics of using PGD to screen for BRCA mutation. Cancers associated with the BRCA mutations occur late in life and therefore options for treating them are constantly improving. “Controversy will still remain over the ethical acceptability of PGD for a susceptible, yet preventable condition”, he said.

BioNews, London

For more information and/or questions, please email us at www.acfs2000.com

Bookmark and Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Print
  • email

SUPPORT THE FAMILY ACT TAX CREDIT TO OFFSET THE COSTS OF IVF TREATMENTS

June 28th, 2012

Dear Fertility Advocates,

Currently there is a bill in the Senate called The Family Act (S 965) and since April 25th a new bill has been introduced in the House that meets all of RESOLVE’s priorities, which includes the Adoption Credit and the Family Act. The Family Act is a tax credit that would help offset the cost of IVF treatments for individuals diagnosed with infertility by a Reproductive Endocrinologist.

There was a lot of representation from the bordering states, such as Virginia, New Jersey and New York. Unfortunately, there was the only one representative from Arizona. As such, we need more voices from Arizona to reach out to our legislators. Below is a list of Senators and Representatives along with the person to be contact and their email addresses. In addition, below is some sample text you can use in an email to these individuals.

Thank you for your time and effort to help your current and future patients,

Senator Jon Kyl – contact Karin Hope at Karin_hope@Kyl.Senate.gov and Judith Gheuens at Judith_Gheuens@Kyl.Senate.gov

Congressman David Schweikert – contact Cassiopeia Son, Legislative Counsel at Cassi.sonn@mail.house.gov

Congressman Ben Quayle – contact Rachel Dresen, Legislative Director at Rachel.Dresen@mail.house.gov

The Honorable Ed Pastor – contact Laurie Ellington, Legislative Assistant at Laurie.Ellington@mail.house.gov

Congressman Paul Gosar – contact Sr. Legislative Assistant at Kelly.Ferguson@mail.house.gov

Representative Trent Franks – contact Bobby Cornett at Bobby.Cornett@mail.house.gov

Congressman Raul Grijalva – contact Kelsey Mishkin, Legislative Assistant at Kelsey.Mishkin@mail.house.gov

Sample letter:

Dear Senator/Representative,

Add some information about yourself – your credentials are very important – and why you are contacting them about the Family Act and Adoption Tax Credit…
The disease of infertility affects 7.3 million Americans (1 in 8 couples), medical treatment for infertility is very successful. More than 80% of patients who have access to initial treatments, such as medication or surgery, successfully conceive. However, most Americans do not have insurance coverage for the medical treatment of infertility. The out-of-pocket cost of diagnosis and treatment prevents many people from having access to this care.

The federal tax credit provided by The Family Act (S 965) would help many people who are affected by infertility to build their family; much like the federal Adoption Tax Credit has for many years.

I hope I can count on your support to co-sponsor The Family Act (S 965) as well as the extension of the Adoption Tax Credit (H.R. 4373).

Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Dr. Nemiro or feel free to contact Barbara Collura, Executive Director of RESOLVE, at bcollura@resolve.org. You may also visit the RESOLVE website at www.resolve.org.

Visit us at www.acfs2000 for more information about this important piece of legislation

Bookmark and Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Print
  • email

EXTREMELY LOW AMH LEVELS DO NOT RULE OUT IN VITRO FERTILIZATION

May 17th, 2012

Extremely low AMH (anti-Mullerian hormone) is not an absolute contraindication for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Dr. Weghofer, at the Center for Human Reproduction, New York City, presented data at the 2011 annual meeting of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) showing reasonable pregnancy rates in women with AMH levels <0.4 ng/ml. The study included 128 women with an average age of 40.8 years. There were 20 clinical pregnancies, 15.6% cumulatively, resulting in 13 live births in 12 women. These data demonstrate a "moderate but still reasonable chance and live birth rates" in women with very low AMH levels.

This has also been the experience at ACFS, that women with very low AMH levels, should not automatically be told that their only option is donor eggs; and be given the option of using their own eggs, because we have found that a successful pregnancy is definitively possible with low AMH levels.

For more information about AMH and IVF, please visit us at www.acfs2000.com

Bookmark and Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Print
  • email

LOW-INTENSITY OR MINI-IVF REDUCES PREGNANCY CHANCES

May 17th, 2012

Mini-IVF or low-intensity IVF, using a milder ovarian stimulation protocol, that is gaining in popularity, significantly reduces the chance of pregnancy, according to data from a pilot study by Norbert Gleicher, M.D.

Mini-IVF or low-intensity-IVF is allegedly more cost-effective and patient friendly while hypothetically producing better embryo quality, say its advocates. But in a poster presentation at the 2011 meeting of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), Dr. Gleicher offered data showing that fewer cryopreserved embryos were produced, resulting in fewer live births, using mini-IVF protocols. Patients using mini-IVF protocols definitely used less gonadotropins (HMG or FSH) but had fewer oocytes retrieved (2.7 vs 15.6) resulting in fewer cryopreserved embryos (0 vs 4.7) compared to women using standard IVF protocols.

With identical number of embryos transferred, after adjusting for age, patients using standard IVF demonstrated a 7-fold better odds of pregnancy and a cumulative pregnancy rate that was more than 6 times higher than that achieved using mini-IVF. The costs per live birth (cumulative) were similar in both groups but the significantly reduced chances of pregnancy with mini-IVF eliminated the potential cost advantages. Dr. Gleicher concluded, “even with normal ovarian reserve, therefore, low-intensity IVF can be considered neither patient friendly or cost-effective”. With decreased ovarian reserve (BAF), mini-IVF should be even less successful.

ACFS agrees with the findings of Dr. Gleicher, and it has been our experience since mini-IVF protocols were introduced, that overall success rates for cumulative on-going pregnancy rates were significantly reduced. However, having once explained and the patient understanding this data, it is her choice as to which protocol she will choose; and ACFS will support her 150%.

For more information about ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF, visit us www.acfs2000.com

Bookmark and Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Print
  • email

ESTROGEN-ONLY HT (HORMONE THERAPY) INCREASES BREAST CANCER RISK

May 17th, 2012

According to the annual meeting of The American Association of Cancer Research, long-term use of estrogen-only therapy increases the risk of postmenopausal women developing breast cancer, according to new data from the Nurses’ Health Study.

The findings suggest that opting for progesterone-free hormone therapy for the treatment of menopause symptoms should not be considered the risk-free alternative to combination progesterone plus estrogen formulations. Dr. Chen of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston also showed that being on HT increased the risk of developing breast cancer relative to those women not on hormone therapy.

For our patients of have premature ovarian failure (POF) and/or need hormone replacement therapy and have no uterus, this newer data should be considered and discussed with your gynecologist, as to whether or not to add progesterone to the treatment regimen. The use HT was to always be weighted for the risks versus the benefits, especially on bone and cardiac function. Importantly, although breast cancer incidence was increased in HT groups, there was no increase in the risk of fatal breast cancer, either in the combined or estrogen-only therapy, Dr. Chen stressed. This is something we are continuing to investigate.

These findings have the potential to increase the confusion regarding HT and perhaps reignite the hormone therapy debate. However, they should be considered in their proper context. “While the relative risk of developing breast cancer is increased, the absolute risks associated with HT are low”.

From OB.GYN. NEWS, May 2012 @ www.obgynnews.com

For more questions, visit us at www.acfs2000.com

Bookmark and Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Print
  • email

ACA’S (AFFORDABLE CARE ACT) UNCERTAINTIES LOOM LARGE FOR PRACTICES

May 17th, 2012

The fate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) won’t be known until at least June- and that adds a significant element of uncertainty for physicians trying to manage their practices. The Supreme Court is expected to issue an opinion on the law’s- and its components- constitutionality some time before its current term ends in late june. Given the complexity of the issues heard during oral arguments in late March, most observers do not expect an opinion any earlier.

The tenor of the four conservative leaning justices’ questioning during arguments suggested at all, or at least some, of the law might be struck down. Justice Clarence Thomas, who generally is silent during arguments, is seen as being in the conservative camp, as well. But there needs to be some caution, because questions by the justices don’t necessarily predict what they’re going to do and how they’re going to vote.

The court will decide on four questions:
1. Is it within Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause to require Americans to buy insurance?
2. Can Congress levy a penalty if they don’t?
3. Can the reminder of the law outside the mandate be upheld separately?
4. Is the federal requirement that Medicaid be made available to Americans up to 133% of the federal poverty line an acceptable use of federal powers?

Some physicians might not even be aware of the potential ramifications of a partial or full appeal. If they throw the whole thing out, its like throwing a hand grenade into a crowded room. I don’t think many physicians have given thought to the confusion and huge chaos that would be created if the ACA is overthrown. If it is then put back together on a piecemeal basis, it’s going to take a long time, and there will be a lot of confusion along the way. One area of confusion will be Medicare offering patients free preventive services. What about the health insurance exchanges? It is costing the states millions of dollars to set up and many are not doing it until they heard of the Supreme Court’s ruling. For the states that have already begin the process of setting up the exchanges, they could lose millions of dollars that could have been put to better use.

Some above excerpts are from OB.GYN. NEWS. May 2012

While there are many potential benefits to the ACA, there will be a number of long lasting disadvantages. In the next 25 years or less, you will no longer recognize today’s health care in the US; and it will look, and probably be, identical to the European health care system. Socialized medicine only works in countries with small populations, between 20-50 million people, and than barely. How can it possibly work in a country of 350+ million people. Lines for health care will be staggering and people will start to embrace the thinking, “if it is free why should I pay for it”, which is true in countries where there is socialized medicine. The quality of health care will plummet significantly and access will be difficult at best. We have the best health care in the world. Most of the new technologies, medications and advanced treatments come from the United States. Clearly the system is broken and needs to be fixed. The ACA is not the answer and will change the way medicine is practiced in the United States forever. Physicians and health care providers will be reduced to laborers providing a government sponsored service and many may become less than enthusiastic about providing that service, let alone even deciding to go into medicine.

One idea getting a lot of attention and championed by Paul Ryan is replacing traditional Medicare with a premium support model. The premium support model would limit government’s Medicare spending by offering a defined contribution per beneficiary. Beneficiaries would use the voucher to purchase a plan of their choice, paying higher co-insurance for additional coverage; but at the same time forcing insurance companies to lower their premiums in order to be more competitive and thus giving a choice between a private plan and a premium support-style Medicare program. There are a lot of smart people in this country that, in a bipartisan fashion, if given the courage and commitment for change, can profoundly alter the current system and create a modern and efficient health care model that benefits ALL the citizens of this great country.

For more on this topic visit us at www.acfs2000.com

Bookmark and Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Print
  • email

IV ACETAMINOPHEN (TYLENOL) IMPROVES PAIN MANAGEMENT AND REDUCES OPIOD REQUIREMENTS IN TVA PATIENTS

May 17th, 2012

Multimodal analgesia strategies for postoperative pain after TVA (transvaginal aspiration of eggs), including use of non-opioid analgesia medications, in conjunction with opioid therapy have been shown to decrease opioid use and improve postoperative analgesia. The results of a retrospective study using IV acetaminophen (Tylenol) suggest that the adjunctive administration of this non-opioid may reduce opioid consumption after surgery and improve postoperative analgesia and patient outcomes.

ACFS has been giving IV acetaminophen 15 minutes prior to transvaginal aspiration of eggs and has seen a significant reduction the patient’s post-operative discomfort, much less use of narcotics, quicker recovery times and patients going home much quicker after the egg recovery. Appears to be making a big difference in the overall comfort of egg recovery.

For more information visit us at www.acfs2000.com

Bookmark and Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Print
  • email

SAVE THE ADOPTION TAX CREDIT

May 3rd, 2012

Save the Adoption Tax Credit

If you are a professional working in the adoption community, we would like you to join with RESOLVE and a number of organizations to help save the Adoption Tax Credit. The adoption tax credit is due to “sunset” at the end of this year unless Congress and the Administration act. RESOLVE is part of a group called the Adoption Tax Credit Working Group (WG), a national coalition to advocate for the adoption tax credit, and we want you to join us. To be a part of this coalition, send an email to info@resolve.org, and be sure to visit the new Facebook page for the Working Group at www.facebook.com/adoptiontaxcredit.

For more information visit us at www.acfs2000.com

Bookmark and Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Print
  • email

LAST DITCH EFFORT TO PASS PERSONHOOD LEGISLATION FAILS IN OKLAHOMA

April 28th, 2012

Last Ditch Effort to Pass Personhood Legislation Fails in Oklahoma

Legislation to define an unborn child to include “the offspring of human beings from the moment of conception until birth at every stage of biological development” never made it to a final vote in the Oklahoma House. SB1433, was approved by the Oklahoma Senate in February and later amended by a House committee, but Republican House leaders refused to bring the controversial bill to a vote late last week after an unprecedented number of amendments were filed on the bill in attempts to protect vital forms of reproductive care.

The refusal to allow a vote riled the bill’s supporters and Personhood USA, the pro-life organization backing the bill. A petition circulated on the House floor to force the leadership to bring the bill up for a vote also failed.

In an unusual political development, leadership granted a vote on a House Resolution today which includes language similar to the personhood bill. However, a resolution basically expresses the temperature of the institution on a particular issue, but importantly, does not have any binding application to current law. It was approved 74-13.

ASRM and SART, as well as the infertility patient community, were instrumental in helping to defeat this personhood measure and we are pleased to report another victory in blocking legislation that has as its goal the restriction of reproductive rights. Dr. Eli Reshef served as an influential spokesperson on the harms the bill would create for infertility doctors and their patients and was particularly involved in efforts to educate lawmakers and the press in Oklahoma. We are grateful, too, to the brave lawmakers from both sides of the aisle who worked to defeat this harmful measure.

Visit us at www.acfs2000.com to learn more.

Bookmark and Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Print
  • email

PREGNANCY LOSS AND MISCARRIAGE

April 19th, 2012

“Some people know I’ve had a miscarriage — my family and a few friends — but mostly no one has a clue. I wasn’t far enough along to show. No one can tell from the outside how devastated I feel on the inside. So when someone asks me, ‘How are you?’ I say, ‘Fine,’ but actually I feel like I’m falling apart.”

— Jane, miscarried at 11 weeks

When you have a miscarriage, not only do you lose your pregnancy and baby, you also lose your hopes and dreams of the future. Your body isn’t working the way you always expected it would; you lose control of feeling healthy and ‘normal.’ And it feels so unfair that everyone else can have babies — you want to shout, “what’s wrong with me?”

No matter how far along you were, when a pregnancy fails, you lose a part of your reproductive story. You have experienced a reproductive trauma and this loss needs to be grieved.

A miscarriage is such a statistically common event (at least one in five pregnancies end in a miscarriage) that it is often overlooked or minimized, but it was your baby that didn’t survive, and the pain you feel is real. Your self-esteem may plummet and you may feel alone in your grief. By sharing your story and hearing the story of others, you will learn that you are not alone.

Excerpt from: J. Jaffe, M. Diamond and D. Diamond, Unsung Lullabies, Understanding and Coping with Infertility, St Martin’s Press, 2005. Copyright © 2004-2005 by the Center for Reproductive Psychology. All rights reserved.

Visit us at www.acfs2000.com or download for free the chapter on the Emotional Aspect of Infertility from Dr. Nemiro’s new book- Overcoming Infertility.

Bookmark and Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Print
  • email

Arizona Fertility Stimulus Plan Controversial Topics in Fertility Studies Arizona Rertility Center Laser Technology